In his new book, The Big Picture, David Graeber describes how to turn a big office building, like the one he lives in in New York City, into a more vibrant and open space.
The problem is that most buildings are not built for living in.
Instead, the buildings’ main purpose is to house people.
The buildings are designed for people to work and live in.
But as Graeger notes in the book, we are getting to a point where the buildings are becoming a “polarizing” place, a place where “the very design of the building is under assault.”
The building in New Delhi where Graebrber lived in a small apartment in 2012.
“The building was designed for an urban lifestyle,” Graebers book, Big Picture: The Architecture of Happiness, tells us.
“But as a society, we want to be more comfortable, more comfortable in the design of our cities.”
So how do you turn a building into a “living space” without it becoming an urban nightmare?
It turns out to be fairly simple.
The first step is to consider the needs of the people living there.
“A great deal of the problems in urban design come down to the design,” Graesber writes.
In New Delhi, for example, a number of people in the building have to deal with pollution from the public toilets and the smog.
In a way, the design is making the place unhealthy.
And the building, in a sense, is making itself unhealthy, too.
When you build a city, you don’t have a good idea of what you are building.
The building itself is a public space.
So while there are some basic design principles that should guide a design, the building itself and the people who live in it are not designed with those principles in mind.
As Graeberg explains, there are other design principles: People are social animals, and they like to be together, and so they need space that is not so small that it is not convenient.
And in cities, there is a lot of noise and lots of light.
These are all things that can be fixed by people working together and by the building being designed in a way that makes it feel like it is a big, open space, and not just a small, closed space.
This means that you have to take into account what the people in that building need, and make sure that those people have the space they need, or they will end up unhappy.
The way to make a building feel “big” is to make it smaller and smaller and then larger and bigger.
In other words, make the space feel big and you will have a building that feels large and spacious.
That is why building architects and designers have to create spaces that are as big as they can, and as small as they possibly can.
But if you can’t be as large as you can, then the people will just move out.
“Building architecture and urban design is a very tricky business,” says David Graesbert, the author of Big Picture.
“It is a really tough business.”
Graebert is not alone in his criticism.
For years, architects and planners have been warning that our cities are going to become “doomed to become like Paris.”
As he puts it, cities are becoming “the next Tokyo.”
The problem, as he points out, is that “we have no idea what we are building.”
The biggest problem, he says, is “the building is not designed for the people it’s designed for.”
Graebber believes we are heading toward a “giant pandemic” of “pink slums” where people are living in “tiny, dingy, dilapidated houses.”
“You cannot get rid of this kind of urban decay,” he says.
So what can be done to turn the problem around?
The biggest thing, he suggests, is to find new ways to design the buildings.
“If you look at the building in the city of New Delhi that we live in now, it’s a massive project,” he tells The Wall Street Journal.
“And we have to do something about it.
If we don’t do something, we’re going to see this as a giant pandemic that we’re just going to have to overcome.”
That would be a massive undertaking.
But the architects and urban designers that Graebery speaks to seem to agree.
The big picture of urban design and design in cities has shifted, Graeberman says, from the design principles of the 1920s and 1930s to the principles of today’s building and urban environments.
The result, he notes, is a “great deal of anxiety about how to build a great new city.”
But if the big picture is changing, and we can be more conscious of the changes, then Graebs is not optimistic that cities will turn into pink slums.
He says, “In my mind, cities will be beautiful.
But we can’t build cities that look like Tokyo